Not sure which package? Get your tailored plan — a 60-second fit-finder, no signup.

Audits · one-time · fixed price

One audit, the measured baseline a retainer builds on

Every paid audit is full-stack: AI share-of-model across the 5 AI engines — ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Grok — plus Google's AI surfaces (AI Overviews & AI Mode), measured separately, on the SEO foundation (technical, SERP/keyword, on-page, entity, content, backlink/domain) — ending in a prioritized 30/60/90 roadmap.

Buy the Full Audit ($2,500) Compare the audits ↓

Your audit fee is credited. Start a Growth, Scale or Authority retainer within 30 days of your audit and we credit the full audit fee to your first retainer invoice. See retainers →

Compare the audits

Compare the audits
FeatureFree Teardown FreeStarter $500Recommended Full $2,500Comprehensive $4,500
Measurement
Buyer prompts tested
iMeasures the whole stack: 20-30 prompts across every AI engine we track for share-of-model, plus technical SEO, SERP/keyword landscape, on-page, entity, content, and backlink/domain analysis (DataForSEO), plus a citation-source map.
5–81020–3020–30
AI engines measured
iReproducible share-of-model measurement (adaptive per-engine sampling — at least 10 runs/engine, never below a 5-run floor — with metric-matched 95% CIs: presence → Wilson, share → bootstrap) plus SEO baselines and ongoing tracking. The proof layer.
22–34–54–5
Share-of-model
iReproducible share-of-model measurement (adaptive per-engine sampling — at least 10 runs/engine, never below a 5-run floor — with metric-matched 95% CIs: presence → Wilson, share → bootstrap) plus SEO baselines and ongoing tracking. The proof layer.
snapshot✓✓✓
Google AI surfaces (measured separately)
iWe report Google AI Overviews as its own surface, never blended into a cross-engine score — it only fires on some searches, and a click lands in your analytics as ordinary organic traffic, so we treat measured AI referral as a floor, not a ceiling.
——✓✓
Competitor benchmark——✓✓
SEO foundation
SEO checks
iTechnical checks: crawlability and indexation, Core Web Vitals, site architecture, schema validity, AI-bot access, and broken links / redirects. On-page checks: titles, meta, headings, answer-first structure, internal linking, and entity / schema markup on your key pages. The full SEO foundation: the technical + on-page checks plus the SERP / keyword landscape, entity and content-gap analysis, and a backlink / domain profile against named competitors.
AI snapshottechnical + on-pagefull foundationfull foundation
Backlink / domain analysis
iYour link/domain-authority profile vs named competitors + a winnable-link target list.
——✓✓
Content & production
Page rewrites
iAdds production + authority planning to the Full baseline: top-5 content rewrites, ready-to-ship schema specs, a Reddit/G2/listicle/PR placement plan, and a named AI Index & Entity Setup (llms.txt, IndexNow/sitemap ping, AI-crawler access, Google Search Console + Bing, and drafted entity-platform listings — set up for you and receipted).
———top-5
Ready-to-ship schema specs———✓
Off-site authority
Off-site placement plan———✓
Reporting & roadmap
Prioritized roadmap
ia prioritized plan in three phases: Days 1-30 fix the highest-impact technical and answer-first issues on your measured baseline; Days 31-60 produce content and on-page work for the buyer prompts you're losing; Days 61-90 build off-site authority (earned citations, review sites, PR) and re-measure your share-of-model. We commit to the plan, never to specific rankings or citations.
3 fixestop-10 fixes30/60/9030/60/90
Logistics
Delivery
iWe begin within 1 business day of onboarding + payment.
within 2 business dayswithin ~3 business dayswithin ~5 business dayswithin 5-7 business days
Audit fee credited
iStart a Growth, Scale or Authority retainer within 30 days of your audit and we credit the full audit fee to your first retainer invoice.
—creditedcreditedcredited
Get startedGet a free teardownBuy StarterBuy FullBuy Comprehensive

New here? The free teardown is the no-cost way to see your gap first; the Full Audit is the baseline most clients start with before a retainer. Want to see what each tier delivers? See example audits (PDF) → (opens in a new tab, PDF) or our work. All delivery timelines →

Why a baseline first

Visibility is a measurement problem before it's a content problem. The audit fixes a number — your share-of-model per engine, against named competitors — so every later change is judged against it. It's also why ~90% of AI Overviews cite a page that also ranks in the top-10 organically (seoClarity, 362k queries) (opens in a new tab): the SEO base and the AI answer are the same fight, and the audit measures both. Yet most AI Overview citations now come from beyond the top-10 (see the numbers below), so citations are winnable without a #1 ranking — which is exactly why you need both the SEO foundation and the AI-answer layer.

Research evidence

We publish what we measured about whether each tier works, including when it didn't — see the full research programme.

Evidence for Starter Audit. Not yet measured — no study currently evidences this SKU. See the research programme →
Evidence for Full Audit. What we measured about whether this works, including when it didn't.
Studies evidencing Full Audit
StudyStatusFinding
Cross-Engine Disagreement Indexproposednot yet measured — proposed (pre-registration pending)
Citation-source composition BY VERTICALproposednot yet measured — proposed (pre-registration pending)
Classic rank vs AI citation, on the same questionsproposednot yet measured — proposed (pre-registration pending)
Does WHO ASKS change the answer? (persona phrasing)proposednot yet measured — proposed (pre-registration pending)
Does READING LEVEL change whether a page is cited?proposednot yet measured — proposed (pre-registration pending)
Earned vs owned: which of OUR surfaces do engines cite?proposednot yet measured — proposed (pre-registration pending)
Evidence for Comprehensive Audit. Not yet measured — no study currently evidences this SKU. See the research programme →

Common questions

Which audit should I start with?
Most serious buyers start with the Full Audit ($2,500) — it's the measured baseline a retainer builds on. The Starter Audit ($500) is a lighter read; the Comprehensive ($4,500) adds done-for-you page rewrites and an off-site plan. Not sure? The fit-finder recommends one.
Is the audit fee really credited if I continue?
Yes — Start a Growth, Scale or Authority retainer within 30 days of your audit and we credit the full audit fee to your first retainer invoice.
Do I need a call to buy?
No. Every audit is fixed-price and you can buy it directly — no sales call required. We reply by email with scheduling once you're in.
How is this different from a normal SEO audit?
We measure your share-of-model — how often the AI engines your buyers use actually recommend you, against named competitors — alongside the full SEO foundation, and hand you a 30/60/90 roadmap.

Most clients start with the Full Audit

The measured baseline + 30/60/90 roadmap — and the fee is credited if you continue on a retainer within 30 days.

Buy the Full Audit ($2,500)

Prefer to see your gap first? Start with a free teardown →

What an audit looks like

A short walkthrough of a real audit deliverable.

The audit walkthrough — what you receive and how to read it. (1:12) · captioned film — no audio by design · illustrative data, labelled in-film

Why Clear Cited

The five levers behind share of model

We get you recommended across the 5 AI engines — ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Grok — plus Google's AI surfaces (AI Overviews & AI Mode), measured separately — and here is the honest system beneath it: what you are actually paying for, and the real limit on each.

Every engine and surface your buyers actually use

the AI engines your buyers use, plus Google's AI surfaces — each measured separately, never summed into one score

The roster is five AI engines plus Google's AI surfaces (AI Overviews & AI Mode), measured separately and never summed into an engine count. An engine is one foundation-model family we query directly; the surfaces have no official API, so they are measured via a third-party SERP provider (no vendor SLA), on their own cadence with their own sample sizes and confidence intervals — and a surface never becomes an engine by being added up. The labelled separate-surface panel states how the surfaces are measured, so naming them beside the engines never reads as an engine claim.

A method you can reproduce

pre-registered prompt sets with published hashes, run counts and a confidence interval on every figure, and null results published on the same terms as positive ones - as standing practice, not a one-off study

Confidence intervals are reported honestly wide and named per product: presence uses a Wilson interval in both products; share-of-model uses a percentile bootstrap in the paid audit and a Wilson interval in the public Index, whose pooled denominator is clustered - so those Index intervals are narrower than a cluster-corrected estimate would give, and we say so. We never narrow a CI to look more certain than the data is.

All four tiers AI cites from

we work all four tiers AI cites from — not just the fraction of your presence you directly own

This is SCOPE — the tiers we work, not an outcome we promise. The per-tier percentages are illustrative (Yext-sourced) and the earned tier (news & forums) is best-effort, never guaranteed.

Almost none of your time

your time required is almost none — sign-off graduates to become yours by default once we've earned a track record, with continued sampling

A human approves every client deliverable until a clean track record is earned; graduation is opt-in, default-off, and reversible — client-facing and published content never reaches unattended auto (AI speed, human-approved).

A system that compounds

the system learns which of your pages get cited and compounds that signal every cycle

Honest-empty until measured — attribution shows the real citations a piece earns, with the engine, prompt and date, only once they are actually earned; no projected compounding curve.

The system compounds — see how it learns which of your pages get cited → · the four tiers of citations we work →

The transparency wedge

A method you can reproduce

pre-registered prompt sets with published hashes, run counts and a confidence interval on every figure, and null results published on the same terms as positive ones - as standing practice, not a one-off study

at least 10 runs per engine (12 by default), spent adaptively — more on high-variance engines, fewer on stable ones, never below a 5-run floor Every presence figure carries a Wilson 95% confidence interval. Share of model carries a percentile bootstrap 95% confidence interval in the paid audit, and a Wilson 95% confidence interval in the public AI Visibility Index — the method matched to the metric and named per product, both computed from the actual runs.

We publish our run counts, our uncertainty and our pre-registered prompt sets. Across the 8 providers we checked on 2026-08-02: run counts 4 of 8 verified; 4 not verified; uncertainty on published figures 2 of 8 verified; 6 not verified; the prompt set published with the results 0 of 8 verified; 8 not verified. The full comparison, with each vendor’s own wording →

That is the wedge: a number you can re-run and get back. See the full method →

Hold us to it, and hold the others to it too — the 12 questions to ask anyone selling AI visibility, each one answered here with a link.